Hello everyone. I just discovered this site a month ago and i'm finding it very informative. I read several blogs about being documentarily qualified so to check whether I'm also documentarily qualified (PD June 06)I asked my brother to call NVC, they said they're waiting for some documents. When I called my agency they said they're still waiting for my PD to be current before they send my updated DS230s and other documents. How can I be documentarily qualified if my agency is holding onto my documents? I got worried since I noticed that some people with PDs later than mine are already qualified...Can you pls enlighten me on this matter nurseidol, t-cell,and all the other experts? Thanks
-guest
Hello. Please consider becoming a registered member so that we can properly address you with your username.
nurseidol and durian already made good comments regarding your case and the only thing I can add to their posts is that you are definitely not on their list of applicants of being documentarily qualified. As mentioned by nurseidol, there were a lot of applicants that were made documentarily qualified on the months he mentioned. If you were not placed on their list of applicants being documentarily qualified on those months just means any of four things I can think of.
1) Your agency and/or lawyer wasn't able to give the supporting documents being asked on time. I will not accept the reasoning that they did not received any letter from NVC on those months as I actually have a Oct. 2006 PD and my lawyer received the requests for the updated DS-230 forms and supporting documents (at least the 2nd time since 2006) sometime May or June. I even had a duplicate request since I requested another one from NVC as I became worried that it has been 1 month since they said they sent one to my lawyer (visa e-mail reply to my inquiry) and my lawyer hasn't received anything yet. Turned out NVC did send something but only mailed it late because they were mailing hundreds or thousands of similar requests to other applicants and they were overwhelmed.
2) They intentionally did not respond to the request letter that they received (hope this is not the case).
3) Your agency and/or lawyer is always late on things that it created a domino effect on the whole process that during May and June they only received the visa fee bill request for the first time when they should have received it and paid for it sometime in 2007 when everything was current with the PD you have.
4) Your case was unfortunatley handled by the Nebraska Service Center. NSC is known to process I-140s very slow. It averages around the 8-15 months range and that hasn't changed up to now. (sidenote:in 2006, cases handled by Texas SC can be approve I-140s within 1-2 months w/ no premium processing needed; TSC has since slowed from 1-2 months to 2-3 mos, 5-6 mos, 6-7 mos starting in 2007 and is now currently equal to NSC processing time of 8-15 mos. or so)
The silver-lining I can think of though is that those applicants with later PDs from yours that are currently on NVC's list of being documentarily qualified may be asked again by the NVC to re-send another set of updated Ds-230 forms and supporting documents that has expired since then. If they do, everything is equal again but if they don't or the NVC chooses just to send it directly to the respective embassies and consulates if their PDs become current then there is a possibility that they may get their GCs ahead of you even if they have a much later PD than yours.
This is not an uncommon occurrence and maybe more common than most people thinks. Remember, if such things do not happen then there should be no one with a 2004 and 2005 PD by now but obviously there are still a few.
As I have mentioned on another post, the delays from the broken immigration system is just one factor. The promptness and the pro-activeness of an agency and/or lawyer or the lack of it is another thing.
Best thing to do is to always update yourself by networking with your fellow nurses and be pro-active yourself if your agency and/or lawyer isn't.
Goodluck.
