Lefora Free Forum
12116 views

2004/2005/2006 Priority Date Tracker

Page 1 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 8 · 10 · 12 · 14 · 16 · 18 · 20 · 22
< older posts 61–80 of 422 newer >
Super Elite - moderator
405 posts

Hi guest. I will try to clear your confusions but I am sure Mr.founder will be at best to give you the clear picture of your case.

If you can still remember, last May-June 2008, VB had shown a cut-off date of March 2006. It was also during these months that the NVC was actively asking applicants to send out to their office the updated ds230s and other documents especially to applicants with current PDs and also to those with PDs that are about to be current.Plenty of cases had become documentarily qualified at that time, even with those PDs beyond yours ( PD=June 2006 ) .

The way I see it, your lawyer failed to update your case accordingly during those months or even months after. Some lawyers are very very active and fast in submitting updated docs to the NVC, hence their nurses were able to be case completed even with PDs later than yours.

While it may be true that NVC is waiting for some documents from your end, Your lawyer on the other hand is right to say that for now,it wont be RIGHT and wise for them to send your updated ds230 and other documents to the NVC, not now, or not until your PD is current or is about to be current. Note that your lawyer will not send it at their own time/discretion coz if it will be the cas, then NVC will be flooded with DS230s from applicants eager to be case completed.hehehe.... They have to wait for the go signal from the NVC.That is, When NVC is again ready to process your case, NVC will formally send a letter/notice to your lawyer requesting him/her to submit your latest docs like the ds230. Again, expect for that to happen 1-3months prior to your PD becoming current.

Hope this helps. Godbless and goodluck.

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Enthusiast - member
68 posts

Hey apc, let's update each other. And yes, I pray that the next VB brings good news to us. We have about a week to go or a bit more before it comes out. I think it will be out by the 11th or 12th, well of course we can check out the consulate in India which publishes the VB earlier.

Regular - member
47 posts

guest,
i believe you are a bit misled if i may say.after paying the visa fee bill,you will be sent a packet(3) asking you to send ds 230 forms along with the other docs.req.by NVC.from there it will take around 4 to 6 weeks before they will inform your lawyer (or you if you email NVC)that you are documentarily qualified,that is if all the reqts.were met accordingly.once doc.qualified,you will then have to wait for your PD to be current,afterwhich you will have to wait around 4 to 8 weeks til interview(packet 4).i hope i helped you in my small way..

__________________
carpe diem!!! :)
Super Elite - moderator
405 posts


guest,i believe you are a bit misled if i may say.after paying the visa fee bill,you will be sent a packet(3) asking you to send ds 230 forms along with the other docs.req.by NVC.from there it will take around 4 to 6 weeks before they will inform your lawyer (or you if you email NVC)that you are documentarily qualified,that is if all the reqts.were met accordingly.once doc.qualified,you will then have to wait for your PD to be current,afterwhich you will have to wait around 4 to 8 weeks til interview(packet 4).i hope i helped you in my small way..

-durian


DURIAN is right. It's actually a continous step by step process. You will notice that this will happen just about 1-3 months before your PD is to be current. Otherwise, nothing further than that will take place. Now since the cut-off date is May 01, 2005, still a bit far from your PD of June 2006. Expect that there'll be silence from the part of the NVC for quite sometime. Not until your PD is about to be current. Again, if that time will come, they'll infrom you through your lawyer of the need to submit the updated docs like the DS230.

Godbless

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Super Elite - founder
1714 posts

Hello everyone. I just discovered this site a month ago and i'm finding it very informative. I read several blogs about being documentarily qualified so to check whether I'm also documentarily qualified (PD June 06)I asked my brother to call NVC, they said they're waiting for some documents. When I called my agency they said they're still waiting for my PD to be current before they send my updated DS230s and other documents. How can I be documentarily qualified if my agency is holding onto my documents? I got worried since I noticed that some people with PDs later than mine are already qualified...Can you pls enlighten me on this matter nurseidol, t-cell,and all the other experts? Thanks

-guest



Hello. Please consider becoming a registered member so that we can properly address you with your username.

nurseidol and durian already made good comments regarding your case and the only thing I can add to their posts is that you are definitely not on their list of applicants of being documentarily qualified. As mentioned by nurseidol, there were a lot of applicants that were made documentarily qualified on the months he mentioned. If you were not placed on their list of applicants being documentarily qualified on those months just means any of four things I can think of.

1) Your agency and/or lawyer wasn't able to give the supporting documents being asked on time. I will not accept the reasoning that they did not received any letter from NVC on those months as I actually have a Oct. 2006 PD and my lawyer received the requests for the updated DS-230 forms and supporting documents (at least the 2nd time since 2006) sometime May or June. I even had a duplicate request since I requested another one from NVC as I became worried that it has been 1 month since they said they sent one to my lawyer (visa e-mail reply to my inquiry) and my lawyer hasn't received anything yet. Turned out NVC did send something but only mailed it late because they were mailing hundreds or thousands of similar requests to other applicants and they were overwhelmed.

2) They intentionally did not respond to the request letter that they received (hope this is not the case).

3) Your agency and/or lawyer is always late on things that it created a domino effect on the whole process that during May and June they only received the visa fee bill request for the first time when they should have received it and paid for it sometime in 2007 when everything was current with the PD you have.

4) Your case was unfortunatley handled by the Nebraska Service Center.  NSC is known to process I-140s very slow.  It averages around the 8-15 months range and that hasn't changed up to now.  (sidenote:in 2006, cases handled by Texas SC can be approve I-140s within 1-2 months w/ no premium processing needed; TSC has since slowed from 1-2 months to 2-3 mos, 5-6 mos, 6-7 mos starting in 2007 and is now currently equal to NSC processing time of 8-15 mos. or so) 


The silver-lining I can think of though is that those applicants with later PDs from yours that are currently on NVC's list of being documentarily qualified may be asked again by the NVC to re-send another set of updated Ds-230 forms and supporting documents that has expired since then. If they do, everything is equal again but if they don't or the NVC chooses just to send it directly to the respective embassies and consulates if their PDs become current then there is a possibility that they may get their GCs ahead of you even if they have a much later PD than yours.

This is not an uncommon occurrence and maybe more common than most people thinks. Remember, if such things do not happen then there should be no one with a 2004 and 2005 PD by now but obviously there are still a few.

As I have mentioned on another post, the delays from the broken immigration system is just one factor. The promptness and the pro-activeness of an agency and/or lawyer or the lack of it is another thing.

Best thing to do is to always update yourself by networking with your fellow nurses and be pro-active yourself if your agency and/or lawyer isn't.

Goodluck. Innocent
__________________
For a forum made by foreign nurses for foreign nurses visit: foreign-nurse.lefora.com
Regular - member
41 posts

Hi! I just wanted to know if someone can advice/comment on my case.

My PD is Nov 2005 which became current last May and June 2008. I sent mine and my husband's updated DS230 and docs May 1 and became doc qualified May 14,2008. I gave birth April 21, 2008 which means my daughter was 10 days old when we sent our DS230. I knew it would take about two months to obtain her NSO birth cert and another two weeks(express processing) for her passport(since I am from the province). I knew if we waited for her passport we would be caught in retrogression again (usually happens July of each year). So we decided to sent my husband and mine only and listed our daughter as following to join in our DS230. We were told by our lawyer that NVC will not process our file if we listed our daughter as accompanying us to the US until her visa fee bill and DS230 and docs are received by NVC but they will process our file if she is listed as FTJ. So NVC processed our file and we were declared doc qualified May 14, 2008.

Now my concern is, what if when my PD becomes current and NVC sends the file to the US embassy since we are already doc qualified. Can we bring our daughter with us to the medical and interview and just submit her docs and pay for her visa fee bill at the embassy? or do we have to leave our daughter behind and process her as FTJ because if she will be processed as FTJ, who will accompany her to the embassy? she is only 6 months old at present. Does the embassy make consideration in cases like this?

Newbie - member
8 posts

Hi guys. As per nurseidol's advice I have decided to join this forum. I'm the guest with June 06 PD. You know what , Tcell is right , my agency is always late when it comes to sending and taking actions on my case. I can still remember that if it werent for the late submission of visa fees by my agency, we would have been able to get ahold of 4 of the 50,000 schedule A visas last 2006. They asked us to pay for my spouse & 2 children's visa fees since they're going to pay for my visa fee. We sent the money August 2006, they sent it to NVC Nov06. Can u imagine waiting 3 months bfore taking action? And now, again the DS 230s and documents. They asked me to send these things last June when the PD has retrogressed. Hay naku!!! Question: Do you think those who are doc qualified with PDs later than mine are already ahead of the line?

__________________
xoxo calirn
Enthusiast - member
68 posts

Hello apc. Well, again more or less we are in the same boat. Way back in 2007 when we updated our DS230, we put our 4 month old son as a FTJ. Then again, we were told to submit another updated DS230 last March2008. Then my wife gave birth to another child, our daughter, last Aug 26,2008. To make the story short, both our kids are FTJ and our agency told us that we just have to bring their passports and other documents during the medicals and just pay for their feebills during the interview. I was told by our lawyer that adding babies or children during the interview are common and won't be a problem. You and your family are all under the same petition so I wouldn't worry about it. I hope I answered you question.

Regular - member
41 posts
Thanks tabachingdj. It's good to hear this because I do not want to leave my daughter behind.
Regular - member
38 posts

if the two pending bills are to be approved, do u guys think that all those who have a PD of 2006 were to have our visas next year? maybe somehow, the newly elected president would notice this problem with the immigrant aspirants

__________________
Ten best ways to relieve stress: 1. Eat a handful of chocolate. 2. Repeat 9 times.
Newbie - member
9 posts

hi EVERYONE,
The DEC VB is finally out. So sad for Philippines EB3, it did not move. Anyway, let's keep hoping for the best.

Super Elite - moderator
405 posts

It's out....hmmmmm speechless till now. Hehehe what more to say than...hmmmm well, continue hoping.

Let's look forward for the January VB, starts the second quarter of the fiscal year.

God Bless and keep the faith high...

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Regular - member
41 posts

Hi. What is the effect of having a Canadian immigrant visa stamped on your passport when you go to your US immigrant visa interview? will this be a reason for denial of your US immigrant visa? The reason I asked is because I'm kind of confused as to which path to go. I applied for Canadian Immigration under federal skilled immigration category in August of 2005. On November 2005 found an employer in the US who filed my petition thus having a PD of Nov 2005. At that time it only takes about 1 to 18 months to get the visa because of the schedule A and if not for the delay on the lawyer's part in sending my packet 3, I should have gotten one of those sched A visas in 2006.

Anyway, Last Friday the Canadian embassy contacted me and gave me 90 days to decide whether I will be continuing my application or not. After the 90 days period and I do not request for a refund of the application fee, they will start processing my file so I am estimating the visa to be released around end of 2009.

With the unpredictabiliy of the US visa bulletin, I do not want to withdraw my Canadian application as a back up because if I still do not get my US immigrant visa in 2009 then I will go to Canada.

Anyway I have two questions:
1. Is it possible to have a canadian immigrant visa stamped on passport when I go for interview at the US embassy? will there be a problem for the consul?
2. There is a termination penalty in my contract with my US employer, do I have to pay this termination fee even if I was not issued a US immigrant visa or do I just have to pay what they have already spent like processing fee and attorny's fee?

Super Elite - moderator
405 posts

@ APC

Glad to know that you have two open options. These two applications are still uncertain if either will be successful as they are still in process. Can I know how much you paid for this canadian immigration processing fee? Is it a very huge amount? If it is not, then I suggest you not to request for refund within the alotted grace period (90days) and let the process continue.At least you wont give up Canada when your US is not yet certain. This move will provide you with options.

Honestly if my opinion is to be respected, US VB is really hard to predict, If I am in your situation, I will still give some more time to observe for VB movements. And if it's not improving, or if its getting worse than expected, then GO for Canada.

Now regarding possible problem to encounter during US consular interview, presented with a passport stamped with Canadian Immigrant Visa. I think there will be no problem if things are properly sorted out.

Lastly, regarding breach of contract or withdrawal of agreement with the US Employer. I believe you have to face the consequence of paying them the expenses incurred related to your US Immigration processing. You may not have to pay the full amount as the immigration process is not yet fully complete. You and the employer can talk and settle to pay such amount that is agreeable to both parties. I also withdrawed my job agreement with my US employer 2 years ago.During that time, My I140 had already been approved,I was asked to pay 2,400US. Case to case basis. I beleiveyou have to pay more if your application is near to be completed, adding to that, you also have to pay the lawyers fee, and not to mention the damaging fee.

Hope I was able to provide some ideas. Again Mr. Founder sure has something to say about your case.

Godbless you and goodluck

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Regular - member
41 posts

Thanks nurse idol for the reply. I think I'll just continue processing my Canadian application in case something goes wrong with the US application. Anyway the processing fee was only 550 Canadian dollars. I am just hoping that the January to March VB will bring us good news.

Super Elite - moderator
405 posts


Thanks nurse idol for the reply. I think I'll just continue processing my Canadian application in case something goes wrong with the US application. Anyway the processing fee was only 550 Canadian dollars. I am just hoping that the January to March VB will bring us good news.

-apc

Good Decision.

Dont worry, the way I see things, It will. If not, then Canada is there. Merry Christmas to you and your family.

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Novice - member
20 posts

PD: AUG 7, 2006
Visa Category: EB3 ROW/Philippines

Status: 1) Case just labeled as documentariliy qualified - no packet 4 yet,
Interview date: 1) No interview date yet

__________________
codath philippines
Newbie - member
7 posts

Hi Codath,
Were you notified by your lawyer that your case is already doc.qualified or did you call the NVC?...because i just called the NVC and thru AVR still the reply was..awaiting for biographic data from the lawyer..there was no change at all since JULY 2008... my pd is april 2006..my agency has been silent and is not updating me with the status of my case..

Regular - member
33 posts

The December VB just shows that all the people with tall stories about getting an interview schedule with a PD after the cut off were just lying i find it disturbing that people can raise others hopes in such a false manner

PD JUN05

Super Elite - moderator
405 posts


The December VB just shows that all the people with tall stories about getting an interview schedule with a PD after the cut off were just lying i find it disturbing that people can raise others hopes in such a false manner

PD JUN05

-topscot

Hello Topscot.

We really cannot judge people as we cannot vouch if what they are saying is true or not. But it is also very possible that some have gotten their inteview schedules even if their PDs are beyond the cut-off date, it may even be the reason why visas were fastly consumed during the first quarter of the fiscal year because NVC is picking and allocating visa numbers to some applicants with PDs later than Mqy 01, 2005.

This is just how I see things. May not be true. Just extracted from my 10th sense...hehehe

Godbless. Hoping for something new.

__________________
"There is no chance, no destiny, no fate, that can hinder or control the firm resolve of a determined soul."
Page 1 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 8 · 10 · 12 · 14 · 16 · 18 · 20 · 22
< older posts 61–80 of 422 newer >

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now